USELESS-SOL
rank #3 · refreshed 46m agoStrategy comparison
5 rolling 30-day windows over the last 180 days. Each strategy entered with $10K, costs: 5 bps entry, 10 bps per rebalance.
| Strategy | Median APR | P25 / P75 | Median edge vs HODL | Win rate | Stdev APR | In range |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ★medium-10pct-rebal | +258% | +87% / +403% | +369.4% | 80% | 179% | 98% |
| narrow-5pct-rebal | +204% | +73% / +340% | +306.7% | 80% | 153% | 94% |
| wide-30pct-passive | +124% | +97% / +248% | +157.2% | 80% | 178% | 88% |
| wide-20pct-passive | +104% | +97% / +240% | +157.0% | 80% | 142% | 67% |
| wide-10pct-passive | +71% | +46% / +176% | +131.0% | 80% | 78% | 50% |
Reading the numbers
The starred strategy has the highest median APR across 5 rolling 30-day windows. P25 / P75 shows the 25th and 75th percentile APRs, so you know how wide the distribution is. Edge vs HODL is the median outperformance over passively holding 50/50 of the pool tokens for the same window.
Capacity warning
Estimated capacity for new capital is $76.5K (15% of current TVL). Beyond this, your share of fees gets diluted at the same time as you absorb more IL. APR shown assumes a $10K position at historical TVL — real APR for larger size will be lower. See methodology.
No alerts, no email gate
The whole point of this site is to publish open data without selling anything for at least the first 3 months. Bookmark the page, or pull the JSON via our public API to wire your own alerts. Why we don't charge yet →